Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013

Commission file number: 1-33818

 

 

ENTEROMEDICS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   48-1293684

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

2800 Patton Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55113

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(651) 634-3003

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated Filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting entity)    Smaller Reporting Company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of April 30, 2013, 55,618,270 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

INDEX

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

     3   

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

     3   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from December 19, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2013

     4   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from December 19, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2013

     4   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from December 19, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2013

     5   

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     6   

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     14   

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     20   

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     20   
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION   

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     21   

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     21   

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     21   

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     21   

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

     21   

Item 5. Other Information

     21   

Item 6. Exhibits

     21   

SIGNATURES

     22   

Registered Trademarks and Trademark Applications: In the United States we have registered trademarks for VBLOC®, ENTEROMEDICS® and MAESTRO®, each registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and trademark applications for VBLOC POWER TO CHOOSE and VBLOC POWER TO CHOOSE AND DESIGN. In addition, some or all of the marks VBLOC, ENTEROMEDICS, MAESTRO, MAESTRO SYSTEM ORCHESTRATING OBESITY SOLUTIONS, VBLOC POWER TO CHOOSE and VBLOC POWER TO CHOOSE AND DESIGN are the subject of either a trademark registration or application for registration in Australia, Brazil, China, the European Community, India, Kuwait, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains other trade names and trademarks and service marks of EnteroMedics and of other companies.

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ENTEROMEDICS INC.

(A development stage company)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

 

     March 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 
ASSETS     

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 29,395,262      $ 22,308,781   

Restricted cash

     200,000        200,000   

Accounts receivable

     18,630        52,406   

Inventory

     1,336,103        1,271,207   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     584,060        571,654   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     31,534,055        24,404,048   

Property and equipment, net

     591,959        609,672   

Other assets

     1,097,438        1,082,765   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 33,223,452      $ 26,096,485   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Current liabilities:

    

Current portion of notes payable

   $ 4,000,000      $ 3,000,000   

Accounts payable

     449,203        340,555   

Accrued expenses

     3,806,826        3,673,609   

Accrued interest payable

     530,075        523,678   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     8,786,104        7,537,842   

Notes payable, less current portion (net discounts of $265,180 and $316,028 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)

     5,734,820        6,683,972   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     14,520,924        14,221,814   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (note 4)

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 125,000,000 shares authorized; 55,618,270 and 41,843,270 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively

     556,183        418,433   

Additional paid-in capital

     224,900,246        211,628,650   

Deficit accumulated during development stage

     (206,753,901     (200,172,412
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     18,702,528        11,874,671   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 33,223,452      $ 26,096,485   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

ENTEROMEDICS INC.

(A development stage company)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

 

     Three months ended March 31,    

Period from

December 19,

2002

(inception) to

March 31,

 
     2013     2012     2013  

Sales

   $ —        $ 123,093      $ 311,493   

Cost of goods sold

     —          85,511        231,520   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     —         37,582        79,973   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

      

Research and development

     2,732,816        2,710,235        130,182,434   

Selling, general and administrative

     3,586,421        2,813,827        63,716,284   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     6,319,237        5,524,062        193,898,718   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating loss

     (6,319,237     (5,486,480     (193,818,745
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

      

Interest income

     2,206        1,552        4,048,346   

Interest expense

     (261,054     (143,605     (12,725,659

Change in value of warrant liability

     —          —          (3,840,622

Other, net

     (3,404     (4,468     (286,253
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (6,581,489   $ (5,633,001   $ (206,622,933
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss per share – basic and diluted

   $ (0.14   $ (0.15  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share

     46,895,937        36,756,637     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

ENTEROMEDICS INC.

(A development stage company)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited)

 

 

     Three months ended
March 31,
   

Period from

December 19,

2002

(inception) to

March 31,

 
     2013     2012     2013  

Net loss

   $ (6,581,489   $ (5,633,001   $ (206,622,933

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale investments

     —          (172     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

   $ (6,581,489   $ (5,633,173   $ (206,622,933
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

ENTEROMEDICS INC.

(A development stage company)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

     Three months ended March 31,    

Period from

December 19,

2002

(inception) to

March 31,

 
     2013     2012     2013  

Cash flows from operating activities:

      

Net loss

   $ (6,581,489   $ (5,633,001   $ (206,622,933

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

      

Depreciation

     42,107        68,029        2,529,135   

Loss on sale of equipment

     —          1,095        74,894   

Stock-based compensation

     1,345,546        710,483        20,034,034   

Amortization of commitment fees, debt issuance costs and original issue discount

     54,656        49,664        4,148,589   

Amortization of short-term investment premium or discount

     —          2,035        (300,071

Change in value of warrant liability

     —          —          3,840,622   

Other, net

     43,980        —          43,980   

Change in operating assets and liabilities:

      

Accounts receivable

     (10,204     (123,093     (62,610

Inventory

     (64,896     65,855        (1,336,103

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     (12,406     28,807        (584,060

Other assets

     (18,481     (23,154     (1,068,877

Accounts payable

     87,845        (187,637     164,423   

Accrued expenses

     133,217        (2,341,439     3,806,826   

Accrued interest payable

     6,397        11,432        695,897   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

     (4,973,728     (7,370,924     (174,636,254
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

      

Increase in restricted cash

     —          —          (200,000

Purchases of short-term investments available for sale

     —          —          (19,890,213

Maturities of short-term investments available for sale

     —          —          19,854,414   

Purchases of short-term investments held to maturity

     —          —          (22,414,130

Maturities of short-term investments held to maturity

     —          —          22,750,000   

Purchases of property and equipment

     (3,591     (48,102     (2,911,207
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (3,591     (48,102     (2,811,136
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

      

Proceeds from stock options exercised

     —          —          215,684   

Proceeds from warrants exercised

     9,500        13,129        6,463,936   

Proceeds from sale of common stock and warrants for purchase of common stock

     13,081,500        —          132,485,939   

Common stock financing costs

     (1,027,200     —          (10,873,501

Payment to shareholders for fractional shares upon reverse stock split

     —          —          (355

Proceeds from sale of Series A, B and C convertible preferred stock

     —          —          63,766,564   

Series A, B and C convertible preferred stock financing costs

     —          —          (1,658,662

Proceeds from notes payable and convertible notes payable

     —          —          47,993,774   

Repayments on notes payable

     —          (563,546     (31,178,928

Debt issuance costs

     —          —          (371,799
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     12,063,800        (550,417     206,842,652   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     7,086,481        (7,969,443     29,395,262   

Cash and cash equivalents:

      

Beginning of period

     22,308,781        28,487,688        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period

   $ 29,395,262      $ 20,518,245      $ 29,395,262   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure:

      

Interest paid

   $ 200,000      $ 82,509      $ 7,872,568   

Noncash investing and financing activities:

      

Cancellation of Alpha Medical, Inc. Series A convertible preferred stock and common stock

   $ —        $ —        $ (661,674

Issuance of Beta Medical, Inc. Series A convertible preferred stock in exchange for Alpha Medical, Inc. Series A convertible preferred stock and common stock

     —          —          661,674   

Value of warrants issued with debt and for debt commitment

     —          —          4,070,532   

Value of warrants issued with sale of common and preferred stock offerings

     —          —          1,684,832   

Cashless exercise of warrants

     —          —          5,244,778   

Conversion of notes and interest payable to Series B and C convertible preferred shares

     —          —          6,980,668   

Options issued for deferred compensation

     —          —          10,898   

Common stock issued to Mayo Foundation and for deferred compensation

     —          —          1,770,904   

Reclassification of warrant liability

     —          —          2,932,766   

Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock

     —          —          51,132   

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

EnteroMedics Inc.

(A development stage company)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

EnteroMedics Inc. (formerly Beta Medical, Inc.) (the Company) is developing medical devices using neuroblocking technology to treat obesity, metabolic diseases and other gastrointestinal disorders. The Company was incorporated in the state of Minnesota on December 19, 2002 and was reincorporated in Delaware on July 22, 2004. The Company is in the development stage and since inception has devoted substantially all of its resources to recruiting personnel, developing its product technology, obtaining patents to protect its intellectual property and raising capital, and only recently has derived revenues from its primary business activity. The Company is headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota. In January 2006, the Company established EnteroMedics Europe Sárl, a wholly-owned subsidiary located in Switzerland.

Since inception, the Company has incurred losses through March 31, 2013 totaling $206.6 million and has not generated positive cash flows from operations. The Company expects such losses to continue into the foreseeable future as it continues to develop and commercialize its technologies. The Company may need to obtain additional financing and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may have to delay development or commercialization of products or license to third parties the rights to commercialize products or technologies that the Company would otherwise seek to commercialize. See Note 2.

Basis of Presentation

The Company has prepared the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are unaudited. In the opinion of the Company’s management, these statements include all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present a fair presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Carrying amounts of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt (including the current portion) is approximately $10.1 million as of March 31, 2013 based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with borrowing rates available to the Company. If measured at fair value in the condensed consolidated financial statements, long-term debt (including the current portion) would be classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

 

6


Table of Contents

EnteroMedics Inc.

(A development stage company)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company does not hold any assets that are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs. The types of instruments the Company invests in that are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include U.S. treasury securities. Such instruments are classified by the Company within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. U.S. treasuries are valued using unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in active markets that the Company can access.

The types of instruments the Company invests in that are valued based on quoted prices in less active markets, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency include U.S. agency securities, commercial paper, U.S. corporate bonds and municipal obligations. Such instruments are classified by the Company within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company values these types of assets using consensus pricing or a weighted average price, which is based on multiple pricing sources received from a variety of industry standard data providers (e.g. Bloomberg), security master files from large financial institutions, and other third-party sources. The multiple prices obtained are then used as inputs into a distribution-curve-based algorithm to determine the daily market price.

The Company did not hold any short-term investments as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments generally with maturities of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value. The Company’s cash equivalents are primarily in money market funds and certificates of deposit. The Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents in high-quality credit institutions. Under terms of the Company’s note payable agreement (see Note 5), in the event of default, the lender has the right to enforce an account control agreement and restrict the Company’s access to their cash and investment accounts.

Restricted Cash

The Company had $200,000 in a cash collateral money market account as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Pursuant to a lease agreement the Company entered into with Roseville Properties Management Company in July 2008, the Company was required to deliver to Roseville Properties an irrevocable, unconditional, standby letter of credit in the amount of $200,000 on the second anniversary of the commencement of lease payments. The standby letter of credit is to be maintained through October 1, 2013. The irrevocable standby letter of credit was issued by Silicon Valley Bank, who required the Company to set up a restricted cash collateral money market account to fully secure the standby letter of credit.

Inventory

The Company accounts for inventory at the lower of cost or market and records any long-term inventory as other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity of a company during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances excluding transactions resulting from investment owners and distributions to owners. There was no difference from reported net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The difference from reported net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012 related entirely to changes in unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale investments.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title or risk of loss has passed, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. The Company sells products internationally through distributors and recognizes revenue upon sale to the distributor as these sales are considered to be final and no right of return or price protection exists. Terms of sales to international distributors are generally EXW, reflecting that goods are shipped “ex works,” in which risk of loss is assumed by the distributor at the shipping point. The Company does not provide for rights of return to customers on product sales and therefore does not record a provision for returns.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development expenses include, but are not limited to, product development, clinical trial expenses, including supplies, devices, explants and revisions, regulatory expenses, payroll and other personnel expenses, materials and consulting costs.

 

7


Table of Contents

EnteroMedics Inc.

(A development stage company)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Derivative Instruments

The Company accounts for outstanding warrants that are not indexed to the Company’s stock or warrants issued when the Company has insufficient authorized and unissued stock available to share settle the outstanding warrants as derivative instruments, which require that the warrants be classified as a liability and measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings and recorded separately in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is based on the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period plus dilutive potential common shares calculated using the treasury stock method. Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce a net loss per share. The Company’s potential dilutive shares, which include outstanding common stock options and warrants, have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for all periods as the result would be anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

 

     Three months ended
March 31,
 
     2013     2012  

Numerator:

    

Net loss

   $ (6,581,489   $ (5,633,001
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator for basic and diluted net loss per share:

    

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

     46,895,937        36,756,637   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss per share—basic and diluted

   $ (0.14   $ (0.15
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table sets forth the potential shares of common stock that are not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share because to do so would be anti-dilutive as of the end of each period presented:

 

     March 31,  
     2013      2012  

Stock options outstanding

     7,559,352         3,576,804   

Warrants to purchase common stock

     25,590,555         23,917,306   

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

There have been no significant changes in recent accounting pronouncements during the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

(2) Liquidity and Management’s Plans

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. For the period from inception (December 19, 2002) through March 31, 2013 the Company experienced net losses of $206.6 million and cash used in operations of $174.6 million. As of March 31, 2013, the Company has not emerged from the development stage and had $29.6 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. Assuming the Company does not receive any additional funds, it estimates that it has sufficient funds to operate into 2014 (including scheduled or potentially accelerated debt obligations). In order to fund on-going operating cash requirements beyond that point or to further accelerate and execute its business plan, including commercialization of the Maestro Rechargeable System, the Company will need to raise additional funds.

Since inception, the Company has financed its activities principally from the sale of equity securities, debt financing and interest earned on investments. While the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining the necessary capital to support its operations, and has similar future plans, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional equity capital or other financing

 

8


Table of Contents

EnteroMedics Inc.

(A development stage company)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

under commercially reasonable terms and conditions, or at all. Furthermore, if the Company issues equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, existing shareholders may experience dilution and the new equity or debt securities it issues may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. In addition, if the Company raises additional funds through collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable. If the Company cannot execute its plan to raise funds on acceptable terms, the Company will not be able to continue as a going concern, develop or enhance products, obtain the required regulatory clearances or approvals, execute the Company’s business plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressure or unanticipated customer requirements. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not approve the Maestro Rechargeable System for commercial use in the U.S., the Company may be required to reduce the scope of, delay, or eliminate some or all of, its planned research, development and commercialization activities, which could materially harm its business. Any of these events would adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve the Company’s development and commercialization goals, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. The Company’s financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability or classification of assets or the amounts of liabilities that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

(3) Inventory

From inception, inventory related purchases had been used for research and development related activities and had accordingly been expensed as incurred. In December 2011, the Company began receiving Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) listings for components of the Maestro Rechargeable System from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), with the final components being listed on the ARTG in January 2012. As a result, the Company determined certain assets were recoverable as inventory beginning in December 2011. The Company accounts for inventory at the lower of cost or market and records any long-term inventory as other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. There was approximately $953,000 and $862,000 of long-term inventory, primarily consisting of raw materials, as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Current inventory consists of the following as of:

 

     March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
 

Raw materials

   $ 189,752       $ 198,647   

Work-in-process

     1,125,077         1,051,286   

Finished goods

     21,274         21,274   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Inventory

   $ 1,336,103       $ 1,271,207   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

(4) Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease

The Company rents its office, warehouse and laboratory facilities under an operating lease, which expires on September 30, 2015. At March 31, 2013, future minimum payments under the lease are as follows:

 

 

Years ending December 31:

      

Remaining nine months in 2013

   $ 214,597   

2014

     291,369   

2015

     221,789   
  

 

 

 
   $ 727,755   
  

 

 

 

The Company is exposed to product liability claims that are inherent in the testing, production, marketing and sale of medical devices. Management believes any losses that may occur from these matters are adequately covered by insurance, and the ultimate outcome of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company is not currently a party to any litigation and is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results or financial condition.

 

9


Table of Contents

EnteroMedics Inc.

(A development stage company)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The Company is evaluating its product, the Maestro System, in human clinical trials, including the EMPOWER trial and ReCharge trial. Both of these clinical trials require patients to be followed out to 60 months. The Company is required to pay for patient follow up visits only to the extent they occur. In the event a patient does not attend a follow up visit, the Company has no financial obligation. The Company is also required to pay for explants or revisions, including potential conversions of ReCharge control devices to active devices, should a patient request or be required to have one during the course of the clinical trials. The Company has no financial obligation unless an explant, revision or conversion is requested or required. Clinical trial costs are expensed as incurred.

(5) Notes Payable

On April 16, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan Agreement) with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) pursuant to which SVB agreed to make term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $20.0 million ($10.0 million of which is not available as the Company did not meet the predefined primary efficacy measures of the ReCharge trial and did not meet certain financial objectives for 2012), on the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement.

Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, a term loan was funded in the aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million on April 23, 2012. The term loan required interest only payments monthly through March 31, 2013 followed by 30 equal payments of principal in the amount of $333,333 plus accrued interest beginning on April 1, 2013 and ending on September 1, 2015, payable monthly. Amounts borrowed under the Loan Agreement bear interest at a fixed annual rate equal to 8.0%. A 5.0% final payment fee will be due on September 1, 2015. The Company may voluntarily prepay the term loan in full, but not in part, and any voluntary or mandatory prepayment is subject to applicable prepayment premiums and will also include the final payment fee. The Company is required to comply with certain financial covenants that require the Company to generate certain minimum amounts of revenue from the sale of its Maestro System and to implant certain minimum numbers of Maestro Systems during cumulative quarterly measurement periods beginning with the period ended March 31, 2013 and ending with the period ending June 30, 2015. The Company did not meet the financial covenants for the period ended March 31, 2013 and therefore entered into a First Amendment (the First Amendment) to the Loan Agreement on May 9, 2013 pursuant to which the Company and SVB agreed to new financial covenants (see Note 8).

The Company has granted SVB a security interest in all of the Company’s assets, excluding intellectual property except with respect to all license, royalty fees and other revenues and income arising out of or relating to any of the intellectual property and all proceeds of the intellectual property. The Company also has entered into a negative pledge arrangement with SVB pursuant to which it has agreed not to encumber any of its intellectual property without SVB’s prior written consent. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, SVB had the right to require the Company to maintain a restricted cash balance of $7.5 million in an SVB account as a result of the Company not meeting the predefined primary efficacy measures of the ReCharge trial. SVB did not exercise this right prior to entering into the First Amendment.

Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, on April 16, 2012, the Company issued SVB a warrant to purchase 106,746 shares of common stock, exercisable for ten years from the date of grant, at an exercise price of $2.34 per share.

Scheduled debt principal payments are as follows as of March 31, 2013:

 

Years Ending December 31:

      

Remaining nine months in 2013

   $ 3,000,000   

2014

     4,000,000   

2015

     3,000,000   
  

 

 

 
     10,000,000   

Less: Original issue discount

     (265,180
  

 

 

 

Notes payable, net

   $ 9,734,820   
  

 

 

 

(6) Stock-based Compensation

The fair value method of accounting for share-based payments is applied to all share-based payment awards issued to employees and where appropriate, nonemployees, unless another source of literature applies. When determining the measurement date of a nonemployee’s share-based payment award, the Company measures the stock options at fair value and remeasures such stock options to the current fair value until the performance date has been reached.

 

10


Table of Contents

EnteroMedics Inc.

(A development stage company)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Based on the application of these standards, stock-based compensation expense for stock-based awards under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was allocated to operating expenses and employees and nonemployees as follows:

 

     Three months ended
March 31,
 
     2013     2012  

Research and development

   $ 327,840      $ 146,281   

Selling, general and administrative

     1,017,706        564,202   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,345,546      $ 710,483   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     Three months ended
March 31,
 
     2013     2012  

Employees

   $ 1,357,290      $ 679,445   

Nonemployees

     (11,744     31,038   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,345,546      $ 710,483   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2013 there was approximately $13.5 million of total unrecognized compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, related to employee unvested stock option awards granted after January 1, 2006, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.03 years.

The estimated grant-date fair values of the stock options were calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based on the following assumptions for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

     Employees   Nonemployees
     Three months ended   Three months ended March 31,
     March 31, 2012   2013    2012

Risk-free interest rates

   1.09%   0.29%-0.56%    0.24%-2.05%

Expected life

   6.25 years   2.25-3.81 years    2.00-9.25 years

Expected dividends

   0%   0%    0%

Expected volatility

   123.18%   82.00%-125.00%    83.05%-122.05%

There were no new employee grants for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

 

11


Table of Contents

EnteroMedics Inc.

(A development stage company)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Option activity under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was as follows:

 

     Shares
Available  For
Grant
    Outstanding Options  
       Number of
Shares
    Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
 

Balance, December 31, 2012

     4,393,985        7,835,533      $ 3.28   

Shares reserved

     —          —          —     

Options granted

     (75,000     75,000        2.65   

Options exercised

     —          —          —     

Options cancelled

     351,181        (351,181     3.09   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Balance, March 31, 2013

     4,670,166        7,559,352        3.28   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

(7) Stock Sales

Public Offering—February 2013

On February 27, 2013, the Company closed a public offering, selling 13,770,000 shares of common stock, together with warrants to purchase approximately 5,508,000 shares of common stock at an aggregate price of $0.95 per share and corresponding warrant, for gross proceeds of $13.1 million before deducting offering expenses.

The warrants have an exercise price of $1.14 per share of common stock and are exercisable for a period of five years from February 27, 2013. Holders of the warrants are not permitted to exercise those warrants for an amount of common stock that would result in the holder owning more than 19.99% of the Company’s common stock.

Common Stock Purchase Agreement—October 2012

On October 4, 2012, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with Terrapin Opportunity, L.P. (Terrapin) pursuant to which the Company may sell up to the lesser of $45.0 million of its common stock or 8,312,122 shares of its common stock over an approximately 24-month period pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. The Company is not obligated to utilize any portion of the facility and generally remains free to enter into and consummate other equity and debt financing transactions.

The Company will determine, at its sole discretion, the timing, dollar amount and price per share of each draw under this facility, subject to certain conditions. When and if the Company elects to utilize the facility by delivery of a draw down notice to Terrapin, the Company will issue shares to Terrapin at a discount ranging from 4.00% to 6.80% to the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock over a preceding period of trading days (a Draw Down Period). The Purchase Agreement also provides that from time to time, at the Company’s sole discretion, it may grant Terrapin an option to purchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock during each Draw Down Period for an amount of shares specified by the Company based on the trading price of its common stock. Upon Terrapin’s exercise of such an option, the Company will sell to Terrapin the shares subject to the option at a price equal to the greater of (i) the daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock on the day Terrapin notifies the Company of its election to exercise its option or (ii) the threshold price for the option determined by the Company, in each case less a discount ranging from 4.00% to 6.80%.

Terrapin is not required to purchase any shares at a pre-discounted purchase price below $1.25 per share, or any shares that would cause it to hold over 9.9% of the Company’s common stock. Any shares sold under this facility will be sold pursuant to a shelf registration statement declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29, 2012. Subject to earlier termination under certain conditions, the Purchase Agreement will terminate on November 1, 2014.

No shares of common stock have been sold under the Purchase Agreement as of March 31, 2013.

 

12


Table of Contents

EnteroMedics Inc.

(A development stage company)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

(8) Subsequent Events

On May 9, 2013, the Company entered into a First Amendment to the Loan Agreement (the First Amendment) with SVB. The First Amendment eliminates the financial covenants that require the Company to generate certain minimum amounts of revenue from the sale of its Maestro System and to implant certain minimum numbers of Maestro Systems during cumulative quarterly measurement periods beginning with the period ended March 31, 2013 and ending with the period ending June 30, 2015. It also removes SVB’s ability to require the Company to maintain a restricted cash balance of $7.5 million in an SVB account as a result of the Company not meeting the predefined primary efficacy measures of the ReCharge trial.

The First Amendment adds two new financial covenants, one of which requires the Company to receive cumulative aggregate net proceeds of at least $5.0 million by November 15, 2013 and $10.0 million by April 15, 2014 from new capital transactions. The amount required will adjust up or down based on the Company’s actual cash position compared to its financial plan. The second financial covenant requires the Company to maintain a liquidity ratio (unrestricted cash divided by outstanding debt) of at least 1.25:1.00 until it receives FDA approval for the Maestro Rechargeable System at which point it will be reduced to 0.75:1.00. The First Amendment does not change the interest rate or the amortization structure. The Company will pay SVB a 2.0% success fee in the event the Company receives FDA approval for the Maestro Rechargeable System.

 

13


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, these statements may be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “could,” “intends,” “might,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause or contribute to such differences include, among others, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events after the date of this report.

Overview

We are a development stage medical device company with approvals to commercially launch our product in Australia, the European Economic Area and other countries that recognize the European CE Mark. We are focused on the design and development of devices that use neuroblocking technology to treat obesity, metabolic diseases and other gastrointestinal disorders. Our proprietary neuroblocking technology, which we refer to as VBLOC therapy, is designed to intermittently block the vagus nerve using high frequency, low energy, electrical impulses. We have a limited operating history and currently, we only have regulatory approval to sell our product in Australia, the European Economic Area and other countries that recognize the European CE Mark and do not have any other source of revenue. Our initial product is the Maestro System, which uses VBLOC therapy to affect metabolic regulatory control, limit the expansion of the stomach, help control hunger sensations between meals, reduce the frequency and intensity of stomach contractions and produce a feeling of early and prolonged fullness. We were formerly known as Beta Medical, Inc. and were incorporated in Minnesota on December 19, 2002. We later reincorporated in Delaware on July 22, 2004. Since inception, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to the development and commercialization of our Maestro System.

Based on our understanding of vagal nerve function and nerve blocking from our preclinical studies and the results of our clinical trials, we believe the Maestro System may offer obese patients a minimally-invasive treatment that has the potential to result in significant and sustained weight loss. We believe that our Maestro System will allow bariatric surgeons to help obese patients who are concerned about the risks and complications associated with currently available restrictive and malabsorptive surgical procedures. In addition, data from our VBLOC-DM2 ENABLE trial outside the United States demonstrate that VBLOC therapy may hold promise in improving obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension. We are conducting, or plan to conduct, further studies in each of these comorbidities to assess VBLOC therapy’s potential in addressing multiple indications.

We continue to evaluate the Maestro System in human clinical trials in the United States, Australia, Mexico, Norway and Switzerland. To date, we have not observed any mortality related to our device or any unanticipated adverse device effects in these clinical trials. We have also not observed any long-term problematic clinical side effects in any patients, including in those patients who have been using the Maestro System for more than one year.

In October 2010, we received an unconditional Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Supplement approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter pivotal clinical trial, called the ReCharge trial, testing the effectiveness and safety of VBLOC therapy utilizing our second generation Maestro Rechargeable (RC) System. Enrollment and implantation in the ReCharge trial was completed in December 2011 in 239 randomized patients (233 implanted) at 10 centers. All patients in the trial received an implanted device and were randomized in a 2:1 allocation to treatment or control groups. The control group received a non-functional device during the trial period. All patients were expected to participate in a weight management counseling program. The primary endpoints of efficacy and safety were evaluated at 12 months. As announced on February 7, 2013, the ReCharge trial met its primary safety endpoint, though it did not meet its predefined co-primary efficacy endpoints. The trial did however demonstrate a clinically meaningful and statistically significant excess weight loss (EWL) of 24.4% for VBLOC therapy-treated patients, with 52.5% of those patients achieving at least 20% EWL. As a result of the positive safety and efficacy profile of VBLOC therapy, we plan to use the data from the ReCharge trial to support a premarket approval (PMA) application for the Maestro Rechargeable System, which we anticipate filing during the second quarter of 2013. If the FDA grants us approval, we anticipate we will be able to commercialize the Maestro Rechargeable System in the United States in 2014.

If we obtain FDA approval of our Maestro Rechargeable System we intend to market our products in the United States through a direct sales force supported by field technical and marketing managers who provide training, technical and other support services to our customers. Outside the United States we intend to use direct, dealer and distributor sales models as the targeted geography best dictates. To date, we have relied on third-party manufacturers and suppliers for the production of our Maestro System. We currently anticipate that we will continue to rely on third-party manufacturers and suppliers for the production of the Maestro System.

 

14


Table of Contents

We obtained European CE Mark approval for our Maestro Rechargeable System in 2011. In January 2012, the final Maestro Rechargeable System components were listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). We have been working closely with our Australian distributor, Device Technologies Australia Pty Limited, to bring the Maestro Rechargeable System to the Australian market through a controlled commercial launch and made our first commercial shipment of the Maestro ReChargeable System to Device Technologies Australia Pty Limited in March 2012. We also entered into an exclusive, multi-year agreement with Bader Sultan & Brothers Co. W.L.L. for commercialization and distribution of the Maestro ReChargeable System in the Gulf Coast Countries, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates and made our first commercial shipments to Bader Sultan & Brothers Co. W.L.L. during the second quarter of 2012. We continue to explore additional select international markets to commercialize the Maestro Rechargeable System, including Europe.

The method of assessing conformity with applicable regulatory requirements varies depending on the class of the device, but for our Maestro System (which is considered an Active Implantable Medical Device (AIMD) in Australia and the European Economic Area, and falls into Class III within the United States), the method involves a combination of self-assessment by the manufacturer of the safety and performance of the device, and a third-party assessment by a Notified Body, usually of the design of the device and of the manufacturer’s quality system. We use DEKRA Certification B.V. (formerly known as KEMA Quality) in the Netherlands as the Notified Body for our CE marking approval process.

We have only recently begun to generate revenue from the sale of products, and we have incurred net losses in each year since our inception. As of March 31, 2013, we had experienced net losses during the development stage of $206.6 million. Although we recently received ARTG listings to sell our Maestro Rechargeable System in Australia and European CE Mark to sell our Maestro Rechargeable System in the European Economic Area and other countries that recognize the European CE Mark, resulting in our first commercial sales in 2012, we expect to incur significant sales and marketing expenses prior to recording sufficient revenue to offset these expenses. We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase as we continue to add the infrastructure necessary to support our initial commercial sales, operate as a public company and develop our intellectual property portfolio. For these reasons, we expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses for the next several years. We have financed our operations to date principally through the sale of equity securities, debt financing and interest earned on investments.

Financial Overview

Revenue

We have received the European CE Mark for our Maestro Rechargeable System, which enables commercialization in the European Economic Area and other countries that recognize the European CE Mark. In January 2012, the final Maestro Rechargeable System components were listed on the ARTG by the Australian TGA and we have been working closely with Device Technologies Australia Pty Limited to bring the Maestro Rechargeable System to the Australian market through a controlled commercial launch and made our first commercial shipment of the Maestro ReChargeable System to Device Technologies Australia Pty Limited in March 2012. We also entered into an exclusive, multi-year agreement with Bader Sultan & Brothers Co. W.L.L. for commercialization and distribution of the Maestro ReChargeable System in the Gulf Coast Countries, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates and made our first commercial shipments to Bader Sultan & Brothers Co. W.L.L. during the second quarter of 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized $311,000 in revenue. We did not recognize any revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

In the United States, we completed enrollment and device implantation in our ReCharge pivotal trial for obesity in December 2011. The primary endpoints of efficacy and safety were evaluated at 12 months. As announced on February 7, 2013, the ReCharge trial met its primary safety endpoint, though it did not meet its predefined co-primary efficacy endpoints. The trial did however demonstrate a clinically meaningful and statistically significant EWL of 24.4% for VBLOC therapy-treated patients, with 52.5% of those patients achieving at least 20% EWL. As a result of the positive safety and efficacy profile of VBLOC therapy, we plan to use the data from the ReCharge trial to support a PMA application for the Maestro Rechargeable System, which we anticipate filing during the second quarter of 2013. If the FDA grants us approval, we anticipate we will be able to commercialize the Maestro Rechargeable System in the United States in 2014. Any revenue from initial sales of a new product in the United States or internationally is difficult to predict and in any event will only modestly reduce our continued losses resulting from our research and development and other activities.

Research and Development Expenses

Our research and development expenses primarily consist of engineering, product development and clinical and regulatory expenses, incurred in the development of our Maestro System. Research and development expenses also include employee compensation, including stock-based compensation, consulting services, outside services, materials, clinical trial expenses, including supplies, devices, explants and revisions, depreciation and travel. We expense research and development costs as they are incurred. From inception through March 31, 2013, we have incurred a total of $130.2 million in research and development expenses.

 

15


Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for executive, finance, market development and administrative personnel, including stock-based compensation. Other significant expenses include costs associated with attending medical conferences, professional fees for legal, including legal services associated with our efforts to obtain and maintain broad protection for the intellectual property related to our products, and accounting services, cash management fees, consulting fees and travel expenses. From inception through March 31, 2013, we have incurred $63.7 million in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

Sales. There were no sales for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $123,000 in sales for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The $123,000 of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was the result of our first commercial shipment of the Maestro ReChargeable System.

Cost of Goods Sold. There were no cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $86,000 cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Gross margin was 30.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses were $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase of $23,000, or 0.8%, is primarily due to increases of $327,000 and $182,000 in professional services and employee stock-based compensation, respectively, offset by decreases of $263,000 and $106,000 in payroll-related expenses and travel costs, respectively. The increase in professional services is primarily related to costs associated with the unblinding of the ReCharge trial and the increased utilization of consultants in place of permanent employees for positions that opened as a result of attrition. The increased use of consultants also resulted in the decreases to payroll-related expenses and travel. The increase in employee stock-based compensation is the result of stock option grants made to management on July 10, 2012.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase of $773,000, or 27.5%, is primarily due to increases of $496,000 and $343,000 in employee stock-based compensation and professional services, respectively. The increase in stock-based compensation is the result of stock option grants made to management on July 10, 2012. The increase in professional services is primarily related to costs associated with the unblinding of the ReCharge trial and ongoing international commercialization efforts.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $261,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $144,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase of $117,000, or 81.8%, is the result of a loan modification which occurred in April 2012 increasing the principal balance from $4.7 million to $10.0 million and increasing the interest rate from 6.25% to 8.00% with interest only payments through March 31, 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred losses since our inception in December 2002 and, as of March 31, 2013 we had experienced net losses during the development stage of $206.6 million. We have financed our operations to date principally through the sale of equity securities, debt financing and interest earned on investments. Through December 31, 2012, we had received net proceeds of $178.5 million from the sale of common stock and preferred stock, including $39.1 million from our initial public offering in November 2007 and $76.2 million from public, private placement and registered direct offerings from 2009 through 2012. In addition, through December 31, 2012 we had received $41.2 million in debt financing, $746,000 to finance equipment purchases and $40.4 million to finance working capital. We have also received approximately $6.5 million from the exercise of common stock warrants. On February 27, 2013, we closed a public offering, selling 13,770,000 shares of common stock, together with warrants to purchase approximately 5,508,000 shares of common stock at an aggregate price of $0.95 per share and corresponding warrant, for gross proceeds of $13.1 million before deducting offering expenses.

As of March 31, 2013, we had $29.6 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. Of this amount $26.5 million was invested in short-term money market funds that are not considered to be bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company or other government agency. These money market funds seek to preserve the value of the investment at $1.00 per share; however, it is possible to lose money investing in these funds. Cash in excess of immediate requirements is invested in accordance with our investment policy, primarily with a view to liquidity and capital preservation. At times, such deposits may be in excess of insured limits. We have not experienced any losses on our deposits of cash and cash

 

16


Table of Contents

equivalents. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance of $29.6 million as of March 31, 2013, together with any interest income we earn on these balances, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements (including scheduled or potentially accelerated debt obligations) into 2014, assuming we do not receive any additional funds. In order to fund on-going operating cash requirements beyond that point or to further accelerate and execute our business plan, including commercialization of the Maestro Rechargeable System, we will need to raise additional funds. See further discussion in the below section titled “Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements.”

On April 16, 2012, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan Agreement) with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) pursuant to which SVB agreed to make term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $20.0 million ($10.0 million of which is not available as we did not meet the predefined primary efficacy measures of the ReCharge trial and did not meet certain financial objectives for 2012), on the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement.

Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, a term loan was funded in the aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million on April 23, 2012. The term loan required interest only payments monthly through March 31, 2013 followed by 30 equal payments of principal in the amount of $333,333 plus accrued interest beginning on April 1, 2013 and ending on September 1, 2015, payable monthly. Amounts borrowed under the Loan Agreement bear interest at a fixed annual rate equal to 8.0%. A 5.0% final payment fee will be due on September 1, 2015. We may voluntarily prepay the term loan in full, but not in part, and any voluntary or mandatory prepayment is subject to applicable prepayment premiums and will also include the final payment fee. We are also required to comply with certain financial covenants that require us to generate certain minimum amounts of revenue from the sale of our Maestro System and to implant certain minimum numbers of Maestro Systems during cumulative quarterly measurement periods beginning with the period ended March 31, 2013 and ending with the period ending June 30, 2015. We did not meet the financial covenants for the period ended March 31, 2013 and therefore entered into a First Amendment (the First Amendment) to the Loan Agreement on May 9, 2013.

The First Amendment eliminates the financial covenants that require us to generate certain minimum amounts of revenue from the sale of our Maestro System and to implant certain minimum numbers of Maestro Systems during cumulative quarterly measurement periods beginning with the period ended March 31, 2013 and ending with the period ending June 30, 2015. It also removes SVB’s ability to require us to maintain a restricted cash balance of $7.5 million in an SVB account as a result of not meeting the predefined primary efficacy measures of the ReCharge trial.

The First Amendment adds two new financial covenants, one of which requires us to receive cumulative aggregate net proceeds of at least $5.0 million by November 15, 2013 and $10.0 million by April 15, 2014 from new capital transactions. The amount required will adjust up or down based on our actual cash position compared to our financial plan. The second financial covenant requires us to maintain a liquidity ratio (unrestricted cash divided by outstanding debt) of at least 1.25:1.00 until we receive FDA approval for the Maestro Rechargeable System at which point it will be reduced to 0.75:1.00. The First Amendment does not change the interest rate or the amortization structure. We will pay SVB a 2.0% success fee in the event we receive FDA approval for the Maestro Rechargeable System.

See Notes 5 and 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a more detailed description of the Loan Agreement and the First Amendment.

On October 4, 2012, we entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with Terrapin Opportunity, L.P. (Terrapin) under which we may sell up to the lesser of $45.0 million of common stock or 8,312,122 shares of our common stock over an approximately 24-month period pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. We are not obligated to utilize any portion of the facility and we generally remain free to enter into and consummate other equity and debt financing transactions. We will determine, at our sole discretion, the timing, the dollar amount and the price per share of each draw under this facility, subject to certain conditions. When and if we elect to use the facility, we will issue shares to Terrapin at a discount ranging from 4.00% to 6.80% to the volume weighted average price of our common stock over a preceding period of trading days. Terrapin is not required to purchase any shares at a pre-discounted purchase price below $1.25 per share, or any shares that would cause it to hold over 9.9% of our common stock. Any shares sold under this facility will be sold pursuant to a shelf registration statement declared effective by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on August 29, 2012. Subject to earlier termination under certain conditions, the Purchase Agreement will terminate on November 1, 2014.

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $5.0 million and $7.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities primarily reflects the net loss for those periods, which was partially offset by depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation and changes in operating assets and liabilities. The decrease of $2.4 million is primarily due to a decrease in accrued expenses as payments related to 2011 ReCharge trial activity began to be paid during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

 

17


Table of Contents

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $4,000 and $48,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is attributable to the purchase of property and equipment.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $12.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $550,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to a public offering that resulted in gross proceeds of $13.1 million for the issuance of common stock and common stock warrants, offset by $1.0 million in financing costs. Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was primarily due to principal repayments on our long-term debt of $564,000.

Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements

We have only recently begun to generate revenue from the sale of products. We obtained European CE Mark approval for our Maestro Rechargeable System in 2011. In January 2012, the final Maestro Rechargeable System components were listed on the ARTG by the TGA. We have been working closely with our Australian distributor, Device Technologies Australia Pty Limited, to bring the Maestro Rechargeable System to the Australian market through a controlled commercial launch and made our first commercial shipment of the Maestro ReChargeable System to Device Technologies Australia Pty Limited in March 2012. We also entered into an exclusive, multi-year agreement with Bader Sultan & Brothers Co. W.L.L. for commercialization and distribution of the Maestro ReChargeable System in the Gulf Coast Countries, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates and began commercial shipments to Bader Sultan & Brothers Co. W.L.L. during the second quarter of 2012. We continue to explore additional select international markets to commercialize the Maestro Rechargeable System, including Europe. In the United States, we completed enrollment and device implantation in our ReCharge pivotal trial for obesity in December 2011. The primary endpoints of efficacy and safety were evaluated at 12 months. As announced on February 7, 2013, the ReCharge trial demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant EWL of 24.4% for VBLOC therapy-treated patients, with 52.5% of those patients achieving at least 20% EWL. The trial met its primary safety endpoint, though it did not meet its predefined primary efficacy measures. As a result of the positive safety and efficacy profile of VBLOC therapy, we plan to use the data from the ReCharge trial to support a PMA application for the Maestro Rechargeable System, which we anticipate filing during the second quarter of 2013. If the FDA grants us approval, we anticipate we will be able to commercialize the Maestro Rechargeable System in the United States in 2014. We anticipate that we will continue to incur substantial net losses for the next several years as we develop our products, prepare for the potential commercial launch of our Maestro Rechargeable System, develop the corporate infrastructure required to sell our products, operate as a publicly-traded company and pursue additional applications for our technology platform.

We believe that the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance of $29.6 million as of March 31, 2013, and any interest income we earn on these balances, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements (including scheduled or potentially accelerated debt obligations) into 2014, assuming we do not receive any additional funds. In order to fund on-going operating cash requirements beyond that point or to further accelerate and execute our business plan, including commercialization of the Maestro Rechargeable System, we will need to raise additional funds. If our available cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balances are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek additional funding through our existing issuer managed equity financing facility with Terrapin, sell additional equity or debt securities or enter into a credit facility. Obtaining funds through our existing issuer managed equity financing facility or through the sale of additional equity and debt securities may result in dilution to our stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt securities, these securities could have rights senior to those of our common stock and could contain covenants that would restrict our operations. We may require additional capital beyond our currently forecasted amounts. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, or the FDA does not approve the Maestro Rechargeable System for commercial use in the U.S., we may be required to reduce the scope of, delay, or eliminate some or all of, our planned research, development and commercialization activities, which could materially harm our business. In addition, if we raise additional funds through collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable.

Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations, the costs to complete development of products and the cost to commercialize our products are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary materially and negatively as a result of a number of factors, including the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect.

 

18


Table of Contents

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development of medical devices, such as our Maestro System, we are unable to estimate the exact amounts of capital outlays and operating expenditures necessary to complete the development of the products and successfully deliver a commercial product to the market. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

  the scope, rate of progress, results and cost of our clinical trials and other research and development activities;

 

  the cost and timing of regulatory approvals;

 

  the cost and timing of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities;

 

  the cost of any recalls or other field actions required either by us or by regulatory bodies in those countries in which we market our products;

 

  the cost of establishing clinical and commercial supplies of our Maestro System and any products that we may develop;

 

  the rate of market acceptance of our Maestro System and VBLOC therapy and any other product candidates;

 

  the cost of filing and prosecuting patent applications and defending and enforcing our patent and other intellectual property rights;

 

  the cost of defending, in litigation or otherwise, any claims that we infringe third-party patent or other intellectual property rights;

 

  the effect of competing products and market developments;

 

  the cost of explanting clinical devices;

 

  the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing or other arrangements that we may establish;

 

  any revenue generated by sales of our Maestro System or our future products; and

 

  the extent to which we invest in products and technologies, although we currently have no commitments or agreements relating to any of these types of transactions.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In doing so, we have to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses, as well as related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. In many cases, we could reasonably have used different accounting policies and estimates. In some cases, changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from our estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial condition or results of operations will be affected. We base our estimates on past experiences and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and we evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis.

Our significant accounting policies are fully described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Contractual Obligations

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, there were no material changes to our contractual obligation disclosures as set forth under the caption, “Contractual Obligations” in Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2013 and the effect those obligations are expected to have on our financial condition and liquidity position in future periods:

 

     Payments Due By Period  

Contractual Obligations

   Total      Less Than  1
Year
     1-3 Years      3-5 Years      More than
5  Years
 

Operating lease

   $ 727,755       $ 287,077       $ 440,678       $  —        $  —    

Long-term debt, including interest

     11,549,852         4,663,333         6,886,519         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total contractual cash obligations

   $ 12,277,607       $ 4,950,410       $ 7,327,197       $  —        $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The table above reflects only payment obligations that are fixed and determinable based on our current agreement, including the amendment entered into on May 9, 2013, and does not reflect the potential accelerated debt payments in the event of a default. Our operating lease commitments relate to our corporate headquarters in St. Paul, Minnesota.

 

19


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2013, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There were no significant changes in recent accounting pronouncements during the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market risk is confined to our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. As of March 31, 2013, we had $29.6 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. The goals of our investment policy are preservation of capital, fulfillment of liquidity needs and fiduciary control of cash and investments. We also seek to maximize income from our investments without assuming significant risk. To achieve our goals, we may maintain a portfolio of cash equivalents and investments in a variety of securities of high credit quality. The securities in our investment portfolio, if any, are not leveraged, are classified as either available for sale or held-to-maturity and are, due to their very short-term nature, subject to minimal interest rate risk. We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. Because of the short-term maturities of our cash equivalents, we do not believe that an increase in market rates would have any material negative impact on the value of our investment portfolio. We have no investments denominated in foreign currencies and therefore our investments are not subject to foreign currency exchange risk.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), defines the term “disclosure controls and procedures” as those controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on their evaluation as of March 31, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer/Chief Operating Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

20


Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently a party to any litigation and we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us that could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. The medical device industry in which we operate is characterized by frequent claims and litigation, including claims regarding patent and other intellectual property rights as well as improper hiring practices. As a result, we may be involved in various legal proceedings from time to time.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes during the three months ended March 31, 2013 to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Uses of Proceeds from Sale of Registered Securities

None.

Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The list of exhibits on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed or incorporated by reference (as stated therein) as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

21


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

ENTEROMEDICS INC.
BY:  

/s/ MARK B. KNUDSON, PH.D.

  Mark B. Knudson, Ph.D.
 

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

BY:  

/s/ GREG S. LEA

  Greg S. Lea
 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Chief Operating Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Dated: May 10, 2013

 

22


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description of Document

3.1    Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and all amendments thereto. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 8, 2012 (File No. 1-33818)).
3.2    Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as currently in effect. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-143265)).
4.1    Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2006, by and between the Company and the parties named therein. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on May 25, 2007 (File No. 333-143265)).
10.1    Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2013, by and between Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC and the Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2013 (File No. 1-33818)).
10.2    Form of Common Stock Warrant, dated as of February 22, 2013, by and between the Company and several accredited investors. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2013 (File No. 1-33818)).
10.3*    First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2013, by and between Silicon Valley Bank and the Company.
31.1*    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101*    Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash flows and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

* Filed herewith.

 

23

First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement

Exhibit 10.3

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of May 9, 2013 by and between Silicon Valley Bank (“Bank”) and Enteromedics Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), whose address is 2800 Patton Road, Saint Paul, MN 55113.

RECITALS

A. Borrower and Bank have entered into that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated April 16, 2012 (as the same may be amended, modified, supplemented or restated in writing from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”).

B. Bank has extended credit to Borrower for the purposes permitted in the Loan Agreement.

C. Borrower has requested that Bank amend the Loan Agreement, as herein set forth, and Bank has agreed to the same, but only to the extent, in accordance with the terms, subject to the conditions and in reliance upon the representations and warranties set forth herein.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Loan Agreement.

2. Amendments and Other Provisions.

2.1. Limited Waiver.

(a) Occurrence of Events of Default. Borrower acknowledges that the following Events of Default (individually, and collectively, the “Designated Default”) have occurred: Borrower failed to comply with the minimum revenue and minimum implant requirements of Section 6.7 of the Loan Agreement (such requirements existing prior to the amendment of Section 6.7 pursuant to this Amendment).

(b) Limited Waiver. Bank hereby waives the Designated Default. This waiver does not, however, constitute a waiver of Borrower’s obligation to meet any covenants at other applicable dates, or Borrower’s obligation to meet all other requirements of all agreements with Bank, nor does it constitute a waiver of any of the other terms or provisions of the Loan Agreement, or any other documents, instruments or agreements, whether or not similar to the foregoing.

 

1


2.2. Success Fee. The following is hereby added to the Loan Agreement as a new Section 2.4(d):

(d) Success Fee. A success fee (the “Success Fee”) in the amount of $186,666.67, which shall be payable upon the first to occur of the following: (i) the earlier of (y) Borrower receiving funds from a sale or issuance of its stock that takes place after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has given Premarket Approval for one of Borrower’s products or (z) the passage of 120 days after such Approval, or (ii) any prepayment of the Term Loan 2012 other than a prepayment that is required by Bank.

2.3. Cash Collateral. Section 4.2 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

[Reserved].

2.4. Financial Covenants. Section 6.7 of the Loan Agreement is amended to read as follows for the month of May 2013 and continuing thereafter:

6.7 Financial Covenants. Borrower shall maintain the following at all times, to be tested as of the last day of each month, unless otherwise noted, on a consolidated basis with respect to Borrower and its Subsidiaries:

(a) Liquidity Ratio. Borrower shall maintain a Liquidity Ratio of (i) greater than 1.25:1.00 prior to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration giving Premarket Approval for one of Borrower’s products and (ii) greater than 0.75:1.00 after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has given such approval. For purposes hereof, “Liquidity Ratio” shall mean (y) the sum of Borrower’s unrestricted cash and Cash Equivalents held with Bank and Bank’s Affiliates, divided by (z) Borrower’s Indebtedness.

2.5. Changes to Terms. A portion of Section 6.11 of the Loan Agreement reads as follows:

if Borrower’s annual operating budgets or annual financial projections, as approved by Borrower’s board of directors, are revised from the versions provided to Bank on February 24, 2012, Borrower shall agree, in writing, to any commercially reasonable changes to the terms of Term Loan 2012 or this Agreement that Bank shall request.

 

2


Said portion of Section 6.11 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

if Borrower’s annual operating budgets or annual financial projections are revised from the First Amendment Projections, Borrower shall agree, in writing, to any commercially reasonable changes to the terms of Term Loan 2012 or this Agreement that Bank shall request.

2.6. Additional Capital Requirements. The following is hereby added to the Loan Agreement as a new Section 6.14:

Additional Capital Requirements. Receive after the date of the First Amendment, aggregate cash proceeds from the issuance of equity securities of Borrower, or from any other capital transactions as approved by Bank in writing, (in either case, net of the financing costs paid to third parties in connection with such issuance or transaction) of (a) not less than the First Minimum Equity Amount on or before November 15, 2013, and (b) not less than the Second Minimum Equity Amount on or before April 15, 2014. Such proceeds shall be held in Collateral Accounts of Borrower maintained with Bank or Bank’s Affiliates until used in the ordinary course of Borrower’s business.

2.7. Addition of Definitions. The following definitions are hereby added to Section 13.1 of the Loan Agreement in the appropriate alphabetical order:

Cash Available Balance” means, for any applicable date, Borrower’s aggregate, unrestricted, cash, Cash Equivalents and short-term investments as of such date.

First Amendment” means that certain First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated May 9, 2013 by and between the Borrower and Bank.

First Amendment Projections” means Borrower’s budget/projections emailed by Borrower to Bank on February 25, 2013.

First Minimum Equity Amount” means, (i) if Borrower’s projected Cash Available Balance for October 31, 2013 according to the First Amendment Projections equals Borrower’s actual Cash Available Balance as of such date (exclusive of any amounts received from capital raising activities between the date of the First Amendment and such date), the sum of $5,000,000; (ii) if Borrower’s projected Cash Available Balance for October 31, 2013 according to the First Amendment Projections exceeds Borrower’s actual Cash Available Balance as of such date

 

3


(exclusive of any amounts received from capital raising activities between the date of the First Amendment and such date), the sum of $5,000,000 plus such excess; or (iii) if Borrower’s actual Cash Available Balance as of October 31, 2013 (exclusive of any amounts received from capital raising activities between the date of the First Amendment and such date) exceeds Borrower’s projected Cash Available Balance for such date according to the First Amendment Projections, the sum of $5,000,000 minus such excess.

Second Minimum Equity Amount” means, (i) if Borrower’s projected Cash Available Balance for March 31, 2014 according to the First Amendment Projections equals Borrower’s actual Cash Available Balance as of such date (exclusive of any amounts received from capital raising activities between the date of the First Amendment and such date), the sum of $10,000,000; (ii) if Borrower’s projected Cash Available Balance for March 31, 2014 according to the First Amendment Projections exceeds Borrower’s actual Cash Available Balance as of such date (exclusive of any amounts received from capital raising activities between the date of the First Amendment and such date), the sum of $10,000,000 plus such excess; or (iii) if Borrower’s actual Cash Available Balance as of March 31, 2014 (exclusive of any amounts received from capital raising activities between the date of the First Amendment and such date) exceeds Borrower’s projected Cash Available Balance for such date according to the First Amendment Projections, the sum of $10,000,000 minus such excess.

2.8. Compliance Certificate. Exhibit B to the Loan Agreement is hereby amended by replacing it with Exhibit A hereto.

3. Limitation of Amendments.

3.1. The amendments set forth above are effective for the purposes set forth herein and shall be limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed to (a) be a consent to any amendment, waiver or modification of any other term or condition of any Loan Document, or (b) otherwise prejudice any right or remedy which Bank may now have or may have in the future under or in connection with any Loan Document.

3.2. This Amendment shall be construed in connection with and as part of the Loan Documents and all terms, conditions, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth in the Loan Documents, except as herein amended, are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.

4. Representations and Warranties. To induce Bank to enter into this Amendment, Borrower hereby represents and warrants to Bank as follows:

 

4


4.1. Immediately after giving effect to this Amendment (a) the representations and warranties contained in the Loan Documents are true, accurate and complete in all material respects as of the date hereof (except to the extent such representations and warranties relate to an earlier date, in which case they are true and correct as of such date), and (b) no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing that has not been waived in writing by Bank;

4.2. Borrower has the power and authority to execute and deliver this Amendment and to perform its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment;

4.3. The organizational documents of Borrower delivered to Bank on the Effective Date remain true, accurate and complete and have not been amended, supplemented or restated and are and continue to be in full force and effect;

4.4. The execution and delivery by Borrower of this Amendment and the performance by Borrower of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, have been duly authorized;

4.5. The execution and delivery by Borrower of this Amendment and the performance by Borrower of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, do not and will not contravene (a) any law or regulation binding on or affecting Borrower, (b) any contractual restriction with a Person binding on Borrower, (c) any order, judgment or decree of any court or other governmental or public body or authority, or subdivision thereof, binding on Borrower, or (d) the organizational documents of Borrower;

4.6. The execution and delivery by Borrower of this Amendment and the performance by Borrower of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, do not require any order, consent, approval, license, authorization or validation of, or filing, recording or registration with, or exemption by any governmental or public body or authority, or subdivision thereof, binding on either Borrower, except as already has been obtained or made; and

4.7. This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by Borrower and is the binding obligation of Borrower, enforceable against Borrower in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, liquidation, moratorium or other similar laws of general application and equitable principles relating to or affecting creditors’ rights.

5. Integration. This Amendment and the Loan Documents represent the entire agreement about this subject matter and supersede prior negotiations or agreements. All prior agreements, understandings, representations, warranties, and negotiations between the parties about the subject matter of this Amendment and the Loan Documents merge into this Amendment and the Loan Documents.

 

5


6. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and all of such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

7. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall be deemed effective upon the execution and delivery of this Amendment by each party hereto.

[Signature page follows]

 

6


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first written above.

 

BANK

 

Silicon Valley Bank

   

BORROWER

 

Enteromedics Inc.

By:   /s/ Benjaman Johnson     By:   /s/ Greg S. Lea
Name:   Benjaman Johnson     Name:   Greg S. Lea
Title:   Managing Director     Title:   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer

 

7


EXHIBIT A TO FIRST AMENDMENT

EXHIBIT B

COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

TO:      SILICON VALLEY BANK    Date:                                   
FROM:      ENTEROMEDICS INC.   

 

The undersigned authorized officer of EnteroMedics Inc. (“Borrower”) certifies that under the terms and conditions of the Loan and Security Agreement between Borrower and Bank (the “Agreement”), (1) Borrower is in complete compliance for the period ending                              with all required covenants except as noted below, (2) there are no Events of Default, (3) all representations and warranties in the Agreement are true and correct in all material respects on this date except as noted below; provided, however, that such materiality qualifier shall not be applicable to any representations and warranties that already are qualified or modified by materiality in the text thereof; and provided further that those representations and warranties expressly referring to a specific date shall be true, accurate and complete in all material respects as of such date, (4) Borrower, and each of its Subsidiaries, has timely filed all required tax returns and reports, and Borrower has timely paid all foreign, federal, state and local taxes, assessments, deposits and contributions owed by Borrower except as otherwise permitted pursuant to the terms of Section 5.9 of the Agreement, and (5) no Liens have been levied or claims made against Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries relating to unpaid employee payroll or benefits of which Borrower has not previously provided written notification to Bank. Attached are the required documents supporting the certification. The undersigned certifies that these are prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently applied from one period to the next except as explained in an accompanying letter or footnotes. The undersigned acknowledges that no borrowings may be requested at any time or date of determination that Borrower is not in compliance with any of the terms of the Agreement, and that compliance is determined not just at the date this certificate is delivered. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement.

Please indicate compliance status by circling Yes/No under “Complies” column.

 

REPORTING COVENANT   REQUIRED           COMPLIES         
Monthly financial statements with Compliance Certificate  

Monthly within 30 days

  Yes    No
Annual financial statement (CPA Audited)  

FYE within 90 days

  Yes    No
Annual financial projections  

60 days after start of FY

  Yes    No
10-Q, 10-K and 8-K  

Within 5 days after filing with SEC      

  Yes    No
 

The following is a list of Intellectual Property that was registered (or a registration application submitted), and registered Intellectual Property (or Intellectual Property for which a registration application has been submitted) that was obtained, and not included on the Perfection Certificate or on a prior Compliance Certificate: (if none, state “None”)

 

 

 

 

FINANCIAL COVENANT           REQUIRED                    ACTUAL                    COMPLIES         
Maintain per Section 6.7 of the Agreement:            
Liquidity Ratio prior to FDA Premarket Approval   greater than

1.25:1.00

  __________   Yes    No
Liquidity Ratio after to FDA Premarket Approval   greater than

0.75:1.00

  __________   Yes    No

 

8


The following financial covenant analys[is][es] and information set forth in Schedule 1 attached hereto are true and accurate as of the date of this Certificate.

The following are the exceptions with respect to the certification above: (If no exceptions exist, state “No exceptions to note.”)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENTEROMEDICS INC.
By:    
Name:    
Title:    
BANK USE ONLY
Received by:    
  AUTHORIZED SIGNER
Date:    
Verified:    
          AUTHORIZED SIGNER
Date:    
Compliance Status:   Yes    No        
 

 

9


SCHEDULE 1 TO COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

Financial Covenants of Borrower

In the event of a conflict between this Schedule and the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall govern.

Dated:                                 

Liquidity Ratio (Section 6.7)

Required:     Greater than 1.25:1.00 prior to FDA Premarket Approval and greater than .75:1.00 thereafter

Actual:

 

  A.        Borrower’s unrestricted cash (and Cash Equivalents) held with Bank and its Affiliates    $               
  B.    Borrower’s Indebtedness    $               
  C.    Liquidity Ratio (line A divided by line B)           :        

Is line C greater than 1.25:1.00 or .75:1.00, as applicable?

 

             No, not in compliance

               Yes, in compliance        

 

10

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark B. Knudson, Ph.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EnteroMedics Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ MARK B. KNUDSON, PH.D.

Mark B. Knudson, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 10, 2013

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Greg S. Lea, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EnteroMedics Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ GREG S. LEA

Greg S. Lea
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer

Date: May 10, 2013

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Mark B. Knudson, Ph.D., in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of EnteroMedics Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

  1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of EnteroMedics Inc. as of, and for, the periods covered by the Report.

 

By:  

/s/ MARK B. KNUDSON, PH.D.

  Mark B. Knudson, Ph.D.
  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 10, 2013

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Greg S. Lea, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of EnteroMedics Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

  1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of EnteroMedics Inc. as of, and for, the periods covered by the Report.

 

By:  

/s/ GREG S. LEA

  Greg S. Lea
 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

and Chief Operating Officer

Date: May 10, 2013